Local-Regulation of Implementation Processes – 15-item Scale (LRIP-15)
Local-Regulation of Implementation Processes – 15-item Scale (LRIP-15) Read More »
Acceptability, Appropriateness, Feasibility: Developed by Weiner et al. (2017), these three measures can be administered to a wide range of stakeholders (e.g., parents, direct service providers, administrators) to determine the extent to which they believe an intervention (e.g., Triple P) or an implementation strategy (e.g., training, coaching, data collection, technical assistance) is acceptable, appropriate, and
Triple P System Implementation Outcomes Read More »
This informational handout provides a description of and link to the Triple P Session Checklist.
Triple P Session Checklist Read More »
Designed to be administered to individual teams within the community Triple P coalition: Team culture; focus on work; team goals; leadership; team tension.
Team Functioning Scales Read More »
This informational handout provides a description of how social network analysis can be used in Triple P scale-up to help coalitions identify connections to other people, groups, or organizations and investigate how those social connections relate to the flow of information.
Social Network Analysis Read More »
This measure examines organization members’ psychological and behavioral preparedness to implement organizational change. (Adapted from Shea et al.’s (2014) Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change.
Organizational Readiness for Lead Agencies Read More »
Embedded with the Making Use of the CCA and IDA Lesson Plan, this online survey is used as a planning tool for service delivery agencies. In certain contexts, Lead Implementing Agencies are facilitating the IDA and can make use of this tool. In other cases, Service Delivery Agencies without a community partner may wish to
Online IDA with Score Report Read More »
The Triple P 5-Year Strategic Plan helps communities proactively plan for Triple P scale-up and support. Lead Implementing Agencies are expected to report the status and planned scale-up of Triple P interventions in their community, in particular (1) the reach of Triple P Levels 2-5 among families with children ages 0-17 and of (2) the